|
SWAT Team Storms Estoril Casino! |
|
Well it had a happy ending, but he nearly didn't make to Portugal
at all! Dave Ablett (aka Dave Moon) missed two flights on the
Thursday but, third time lucky and 24 hours later, he reached
Estoril in the nick of time to play in the 4th TrueMoneyGames
Portuguese Open directed by Chiva Taffazoli of the World
Backgammon Association. The casino which hosts the event looks out
across fountains (reminiscent of the Bellagio, if not quite as
grand), a long sloping green, and then the sea. Dave became part
of a 'SWAT' team of (mainly Bristol) players who cut through the
opposition in the Intermediates like butter. Neither a Dane nor a
German was left standing by the end of the weekend. Unfortunately
the Brits did not fare quite so well in the Masters division. |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
![]() Red (Raj) on roll, cube action? |
|
With the glaring weaknesses in my position (broken mid, three men
stuck on his 2-point, some horrible even/even rolls) I did
seriously consider passing. However Raj's position has its flaws
(such as his made acepoint), and in fact it is the redouble which
is marginal at best, unless your opponent actually does pass. My
reward for correctly taking was to get gammoned on the 4-cube to
go down 10-3 (to 13) but a fortunate triple in the next game,
followed by a single point, levelled the scores at 10-10. After
several thick slices of luck I managed to squeak home at DMP, but
I lost a close match in the next round to the eventual champion,
Austrian player Frans Joseph Bergi. Raj also crashed out of the
Consolation in the first round, but still managed to scoop a
'sportsmanship' trophy. (Jealous? Moi?) |
![]() |
|
Noticing the 'live grenades' which Christian had carelessly left
unattended in his home board, Gaz correctly used his 4-3 to
saunter off with one man from his bar anchor, 18/11. He was
rewarded when Christian rolled the horrific 6-6 anti-joker
(13/7(3), 7/1) and Gaz then proceeded to pick up all the shrapnel
with 4-1, followed by another ace. He came close to winning a
triple, but contented himself with a gammon, and finished his
opponent off next game. |
![]() Red (Nielsen) on roll, cube action? |
|
With two blots exposed for Nielsen to shoot at, and a very ragged
position, there was some later disagreement among experts as to
whether or not this was a take, particularly in view of the match
score. In fact it is only a small double and a huge take even at
the score; for money doubling would be a blunder. Cecilia
correctly took and lost a single in this game but won the match to
progress to the quarter-final, where at one stage she trailed 1-6
to 9 before her 'boot-camp' training kicked in. Her next opponent
(in the semi) resigned the match when he could still stay alive by
throwing two doubles providing Cecilia rolled a one. I happened to
be watching at this moment and was quite shocked – I am not used
to seeing backgammon players throw away their last small, but
significant, crumbs of equity in this manner. So now the fairytale
ending was on, as long as Dave could cut down the opposition in
the other half of the draw. |
![]() DMP: Red (Ablett) to play 5-3 |
|
Chris Ternel and I who were watching nodded knowingly at each
other. We knew that in these sorts of positions, when you are
trailing badly and need to hit a shot, keeping the rearmost point
is imperative. Dave thought for while and tried out 22/14, and
then 18/10. He thought for a bit longer, eventually settling on
22/14. His opponent pointed on him with a 5-1 (8/3 4/3) but Dave
came straight back with a 5-4 and Claus couldn't find another 5
until Dave was home and dry. So what's the correct play with the
5-3? It turns out that Dave's play of 22/14 is tied for first
place with a play which keeps the back anchor – but not the way
Chris and I had been thinking. 18/13 18/15 leaves far fewer hit
and cover-or-lift numbers than 18/10 (11 vs 17) and it keeps the
22-point for last ditch hitting opportunities. However, the bar
anchor does have some value here while Claus holds the mid, and
breaking the 3-point with 22/14 is not too harmful: the blot left
behind is almost as good as keeping the point. |
|
|
|
Many thanx to Peter Bennet for this article - published 29th May 2009 |
|
|
| Do you have a comment to add to this article? You may do so on the Discussion Board. |
|
|